<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Interaction Designer Craig Dennis &#187; Lightbox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://craigmdennis.com/tag/lightbox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://craigmdennis.com</link>
	<description>The portfolio &#38; blog for Craig Dennis, an Interaction Designer based in South East England</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:11:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Lightbox 2 vs Lightview Plus?</title>
		<link>http://craigmdennis.com/282/</link>
		<comments>http://craigmdennis.com/282/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 03:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightview]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigmdennis.com/?p=282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am now using Lightview to test it compared to Lightbox 2. On the plus side it looks a lot prettier (if that were possible) and its transitions are sleeker. It has two key features that Lighbox does not&#8230; It has the ability to have a slideshow in the same screen with the click of... <a class="more" href="http://craigmdennis.com/282/">Read more &#8594;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am now using Lightview to test it compared to Lightbox 2.</p>
<p>On the plus side it looks a lot prettier (if that were possible)  and its transitions are sleeker. It has two key features that Lighbox does not&#8230; It has the ability to have a slideshow in the same screen with the click of a button and is very smooth. The other is that it scales the image to fit into the browser window. This was a major problem for me with the last project&#8217;s slides as they had to be 1024&#215;768 (for some reason).</p>
<p>There is a downside though, depending on how large the image is the scaling process can cause a lot of artefacts and is completely useless with text (like a slideshow for example). As if you&#8217;ve zoomed out in photoshop&#8230; the image is very pixelly. I recommed re-scaling all images to a max of 800&#215;600 (which I will be doing with my slide show) to make the most of the progam.</p>
<p>Oh and its also in one handy little package that you upload to the plug-ins folder in WordPress <img src="http://craigmdennis.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif?9d7bd4" alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/lightview-plus/" target="_blank">Here it is</a> on the WordPress site if you want to test it out for yourself.<a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/lightview-plus/" target="_blank"><br />
</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://craigmdennis.com/282/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: craigmdennis.com @ 2012-02-10 13:03:18 by W3 Total Cache -->
