My dissertation is about internet security and internet privacy issues. The fact that they are both such large parts of everyone’s online experience and yet they seem to constantly battle against each other for supremacy. Can there be harmony or is there an inherent paradox between them meaning they can never function in equilibrium?

As part of the dissertation process interviews were conducted, one of which with the global IT manager of Premier Oil, to establish what issues are involved in business as well as consumer experiences and what guidelines they have to adhere to. More importantly if any of them are working or not.

Read my dissertation here ›

If you would like to help me out and fill it out, it’s just 10 questions and the link is below.

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=z9I4F5ll_2b_2bZgd_2fY1SSx8EA_3d_3d

There is an inherent paradox with security and privacy issues surrounding the internet. They seem to be unable to work in harmony even though their definitions are exclusive of each other. Could this be due to pressures from the music and film industries with regard to file? A look into other areas where privacy and security issues have been addressed, possibly in the area of terrorism, something to which file sharers have been accused of.

A large part of this and in fact what has brought this to light is file sharing and the problems & controversy that it is causing. ISPs are being forced to take responsibility for what their customers are downloading which means they are forced to void their subscribers’ privacy through ‘deep packet inspection’ which has issues within itself. To try and combat this, the ‘three strike rule’ was proposed which was narrowly defeated. Neither the government nor the music / film industries know how to combat illegal file sharers or ‘unauthorised distribution of copyrighted material’ so they are trying to see what EVERYONE is downloading in order to catch those few who with nefarious purposes.

Historically there has been a problem with security and privacy, none more so than during times of war. The privacy of other nations was being invaded but it was needed to ensure the security of the home nation. Is this the reason people when we examine privacy vs security within the borders of a nation? Is the problem now an international one and should it be dealt with on an international scale with all countries signing a document? There is a possible reference to the enigma machine, message encryption and code breaking. Has anything really changed since then and is it just the technology that has advanced on both sides of the current ‘cyber war’?

Why is illegal or copyright file-sharing so prolific? Is the government to blame or is it the greed of the industries which are being infringed?

Sony BMG has released their entire music collection for free, with a 10 second advert at the start of each song. It is free to download and listen to but costs to transfer to an mp3 player, for which one would hope they would have removed the advert. This is a sign that things are changing and industries are realising they cannot simply BAN everyone who they suspect is illegally getting their content. Instead they are seeing that there are other financial models that gives users’ and themselves what they want, without pressuring governments and regulatory bodies into taking foolhardy ‘seen to be taking action’ actions.

The aim is to find out why we need security and why we want privacy. The key difference is in the need vs want. Security is paramount as without it we are vulnerable yet we want privacy which seems to be infringed upon by security. Can we ever find a way that we are being protected and anonymous?

People to Contact

Torrent Users – as part of the Bit Torrent community I am able to easily contact people about how they use the service. Some of the largest copyright infringement lawsuits are aimed at the users directly or at the people who provide ‘trackers’.

Torrent Trackers – such as Torrent Leech and The Pirate Bay the latter of which is a more prominent name and is currently undergoing a legal battle in Sweden which started by the Swedish police confiscated 180 servers. The site remains operational.

Phorm - internet advertising agency that have been in the media recently about violating internet privacy laws even though they tried to make their targeted ad system anonymous. Their video indicated that it was anonymous so I would be interested as to what they have violated.

ISPs – internet service providers such as BT, Virgin, Tiscali, Pipex etc. would be a great source of information with regard to the pressures they faced recently with the government’s proposed ‘three strike ban’. Luckily this was voted out, but only narrowly.

Government – contacting any area of the government that deals with this area would be very beneficial as the argument needs to have an official line in order to get both sides and ensure a balance and having a direct quote from a government official would be a fantastic example.

Sony BMG – it would be interesting to find out how long they have been thinking about their move to freely distribute their content. They are in partnership with one site which would also be worth contacting to find out how they managed to get a huge distributor to do what no one said could be done.

What is the difference between internet security and internet privacy?

There is an inherent paradox with security and privacy issues surrounding the internet. They seem to be unable to work in harmony even though their definitions are exclusive of each other. Could this be due to pressures from the music and film industries with regard to file sharing or is there an inextricable struggle between them? A look into other areas where privacy and security issues have been addressed, possibly in the area of terrorism, something to which file sharers have been accused of.

A large part of this and in fact what has brought this to light is file sharing and the problems & controversy that it is causing. ISPs are being forced to take responsibility for what their customers are downloading which means they are forced to void their subscribers’ privacy through ‘deep packet inspection’ which has issues within itself. To try and combat this the ‘three strike rule’ was proposed which was narrowly defeated. Neither the government nor the music / film industries know how to combat illegal file sharers or ‘unauthorised distribution of copyrighted material’ so they are trying to see what EVERYONE is downloading in order to catch those few who with nefarious purposes.

Recent news says that Sony BMG has released it’s entire music collection for free, with a 10 second advert at the start of each song. It is free to download and listen to but costs to transfer to an mp3 player, for which one would hope they would have removed the advert. This is a sign that things are changing and industries are realising they cannot simply BAN everyone who they suspect is illegally getting their content. Instead they are seeing that there are other financial models that gives users’ and themselves what they want, without pressuring governments and regulatory bodies into taking foolhardy ‘seen to be taking action’ actions.

This is the best way I have been able to phrase the content of my proposed dissertation so far. I haven’t thought of anything better but then I guess that’s the whole point of the ‘preparation’ aspect. I think a thesaurus may be needed.

The general content of my dissertation will be on the paradox that is the security and privacy issues surrounding the internet. Originally I was going to focus specifically on file sharing and the problems that it is causing. Such as ISPs being forced to take responsibility for what their customers are downloading. I wrote an essay on this subject as part of a contextual studies unit which can be found here.

While writing that essay I realised that what I was talking about had wider reaching implications and so the thought process for my dissertation began.

People to contact:

Phorm – internet advertising agency who have been in the media recently about violating internet privacy laws even though they tried to make their targeted ad system anonymous. Their video indicated to me that it was anonymous so I would be interested as to what they have violated.

ISPs – internet service providers such as BT, Virgin, Tiscali, Pipex etc. would be a great source of information with regard to the pressures they faced recently with the government’s proposed ‘three strike ban’. Luckily this was voted out, but only narrowly.

Government - contacting any area of the government that deals with this area would be very beneficial to my argument as I want to get both sides of it to ensure a balance and having a direct quote from a government official would be a fantastic example.

So there you have it so far… thats pretty much my synopsis done

Other words and phrases that could be included in the question:

Succumbing, Surrendering, Encroaching, Blurring the line, Demise of, Cracking
Security, Protection, Safety, Safeguard
Privacy, Anonymity